Two weeks ago, as an entrepreneur in residence at the Garage at Northwestern San Francisco, I had the pleasure of hosting a roundtable discussion over dinner with a group of alumni fractional leaders. Our conversation focused on understanding and unpacking the growing trend of fractional leadership, an alternative engagement model for organizations to tap into seasoned talent to bridge critical leadership gaps. The term "fractional" is growing in popularity and usage. As a practicing fractional product and design leader, I was particularly excited to explore this topic from the perspective of leaders in other disciplines, including marketing, operations, and engineering, and my fellow, Northwestern/Kellogg alums, provided a rich and nuanced discussion. We aimed to walk away with a primer to share so that others could understand the topic. Over two hours of lively conversation and a table full of expertise, great food, and opinions, we delved deeply into shared experiences with this evolving model.
Fractional leadership is emerging as a distinct engagement model for leaders and lead-level contributors. This model allows organizations to bring in experienced leaders part-time, allowing for a blend of strategic input and operational involvement without the full-time commitment. The essence of fractional leadership can be captured in the "Me-as-a-Service" model, a concept coined by Behzod Sirjani and shared during our dinner by alumni Josh Grau. This framing encapsulates the idea of providing leadership and expertise on an embedded, time-constrained basis as one of the services an independent leader or operator may provide to their clients.
Differing from traditional consulting, interim roles, advising, or full-time positions, fractional leadership combines some of the elements of these standard engagement models. It offers a unique blend of flexibility, strategic involvement, and operational control.
A time-constrained commitment with an open-ended leadership scope characterizes fractional engagements. Leaders are functionally embedded within the organization, providing a more integrated presence than consultants or advisors, and may have a span of control similar to their full-time peers. This model is particularly beneficial for organizations that need high-level expertise but cannot justify a full-time position. Fractional leaders step into critical roles, offering strategic insight, direction, and oversight similar to a full-time executive but on a part-time basis.
Choosing an Engagement Model
A key part of our discussion was the value exchange between fractional leaders and the organizations in which they are engaged. Why would an organization engage a fractional leader rather than hire a full-time executive or a consultant or attempt to do without?
For many organizations, cost efficiency is a key reason for engaging a fractional leader. Full-time executives come with significant financial commitments, including salaries and benefits, which can be prohibitive, especially for startups and smaller companies. Fractional leaders provide high-level strategic insight and operational oversight on a part-time basis, making them a cost-effective solution for organizations that require expertise but need more work to justify a full-time position.
While valuable for specific projects, consultants often lack the integration and team direction that fractional leaders can provide. This is especially true when efforts are more ambiguous and cannot be neatly summarized in the scope of a project. Fractional roles often involve managing teams and vendors, ensuring alignment with the company’s goals, and driving initiatives forward, tasks that require a more embedded and continuous presence.
Attempting to operate without the necessary leadership can leave significant gaps in an organization’s strategic and operational capabilities. This approach is often painful and unsustainable, as the work is typically critical for growth. Current executives may lack the expertise, bandwidth, or interest to handle these responsibilities effectively. Fractional leaders bridge these gaps by providing the needed expertise and focus, allowing existing executives to concentrate on core competencies and responsibilities.
For executives, fractional roles enable them to make significant strategic contributions to an organization without the need for long-term commitment. This has a two-fold benefit. It allows them to stay above the fray of internal politics that can at times accompany full-time roles. Their focus is typically on delivering results and providing strategic guidance, which can allow them to remain focused on their mission and avoid the distractions of office dynamics. It also provides a way for executives to test out different industries and companies before committing to a full-time position. This "try-before-you-buy" approach can be mutually beneficial, allowing the executive and the organization to ensure a good fit before making a longer-term commitment.
The value exchange between fractional leaders and the organizations that engage them is multifaceted and mutually beneficial. Organizations gain access to high-caliber expertise and strategic insight without the financial burden of a full-time executive. This flexibility is particularly valuable for startups and smaller companies that need specialized skills to drive growth and ensure alignment with their goals but cannot justify a full-time position. Fractional leaders seamlessly integrate into teams, manage critical initiatives, and fill gaps in leadership, allowing current executives to focus on core responsibilities.
For executives, fractional roles provide the opportunity to make significant strategic contributions while maintaining autonomy and avoiding the long-term commitments and internal politics of full-time positions. This model offers the flexibility to work across various industries, broadening their experience and professional network. Additionally, it provides a "try-before-you-buy" scenario, allowing the executive and the organization to ensure a good fit before committing to a permanent role. This dynamic exchange of value ensures that both parties benefit from the engagement, fostering growth, innovation, and mutual satisfaction.
The term "fractional" is growing in popularity and usage. A quick search on LinkedIn for people utilizing fractional in their current roles brings back dozens of pages of results. Our table debated whether fractional leadership is a buzzy new name for an old concept and settled on it being its own thing. However, with much conversation and back-and-forth. There is enough differentiation between fractional engagements and other engagement models (see Choosing an Engagement Model) for it to stand independently. Determining whether fractional leadership represents a fundamental shift in how we think about leadership-level talent engagement is still premature. However, enough evidence suggests that it provides a dynamic and adaptable model for success in today’s ever-changing business landscape.
Fractional leadership offers a unique value proposition for both organizations and executives. It can be especially beneficial for early-stage and growth startups, which can access critical expertise without bearing the full financial burden of a full-time executive role. These organizations can leverage fractional leaders' part-time strategic input and operational oversight to drive growth, manage teams, and ensure alignment with their goals.
As the business landscape evolves, fractional leadership may be a cornerstone for small to solopreneur early-stage and small-team growth companies seeking to leverage high-level expertise without the constraints of full-time commitments. This innovative engagement model promises to become a vital strategy, providing a flexible and cost-effective pathway to success.
Daniil is a co-founder at The Omnivore, creating an intelligent direct-to-consumer commerce platform for restaurants that will supercharge how fine-dining guests experience their favorite special occasion destinations.
2311 Campus Drive Suite 2300
Evanston, IL 60208
.png)
